The Case for Building Better Residential

Residential properties in mega metropolitan cities are often short of satisfaction for occupiers. Many may find their flat small, inefficient, and developers trying to cram in all kinds of features with the hope of justifying its price. This is a result of residential units built to prioritize developer’s profit over end user’s satisfaction. With WFH becoming a well adopted trend due to Covid-19, tenants and occupiers are now reexamining their homes, and demanding higher quality space that is compatible with the current environment, and less so on the building’s location or proximity to the CBD.

Taking the Kennedy Terrace project as an example, a building that was designed with the end user is the priority. With a peerless 3700 sqft for its 3 en-suite standard simplex, it sits comfortably on the top of luxury residential tenants’ shortlist. As a direct consequence of not building 1800 sqft flats, competing with the surrendering offerings, Kennedy Terrace achieved approximately double that of neighboring apartment buildings when compared on a per sqft basis. The ample ceiling height, efficient layout of the unit, and the centralization of the apartment’s electrical system make the flat the ultimate blank canvas for its occupiers to personalize the unit to their heart’s content

Increasingly, landlords and developers of luxury residential sites are now faced with a dichotomy, whether to prioritize the volume of units available, or catering to the undeserved demand for larger space such as Kennedy Terrace. While the decision to provide truly spacious flats at the expense of a number of units may seem counterproductive at the beginning, filling the glaring disconnect between developer and end user’s may be as rewarding, if not more. 

Real Estate Woes in the Digital Age

Why spend time and money to travel to places to do something that can be done in the comfort of home? Many find themselves asking this question as they acclimate to staying and working from home with the virus outbreak, by both employees and business owners. Internet connectivity has allowed the comfort of residential to compete with other sectors of real estate. For technology companies, the Coronavirus may even be a blessing in disguise in the long term, allowing them to eliminate most of their office space needs and overhead costs.

Real Estate’s historical performance has perhaps enabled landlord’s complacency.

As the internet becomes increasingly accessible, the rate of digitization and technological integration across companies and industries becomes exponential. Yet real estate remains very much a lagger. Partly due to QE stemming from the previous crisis, real estate has generally enjoyed decent ROI regardless of their level of technological adoption. As a result, landlords are not incentivized to invest in technology as much as they should. The situation brought on by Covid-19 shines a harsh light on real estate’s inadequacy in connectivity. Sectors like retail are among the worst hit, whose cannibalization by e-commerce is further exacerbated by the virus. Like many industries, real estate needs to reposition itself in the “Next Normal”, and technological integration could be the key in unlocking its dormant values.





Telemedicine, among a host of various digital service, is decreasing doctors’ demand for physical space.

Over the years, numerous technologies were employed to enhance real estate’s connectivity and value, such as VR for inspection, shared economy platform in the form of Airbnb, IoT sensors for development and maintenance, monitors for customer analytics, to name a few. Nevertheless, the real challenge lies in its connectivity with the online world. Numerous online services are now replacing our traditional way of life; Zoom replacing the need for office, telemedicine replacing clinics, etc. While these online services do not completely remove the need for real estate, they are more than capable of significantly dampening demand and therefore crippling valuation.